Explore Our Consulting Services

We seek to cultivate the next generation of human connection through revolutionary and transformative educational practices.

Educational programs that move from “good ideas” to sustained practice

Oracle Inn Consulting supports schools, districts, and community partners to build programs that educators can implement, leaders can bolster, and stakeholders can utilize.

Through strong design, high-quality delivery, and credible monitoring, we support education initiatives so your team can focus on what matters: confidence, measurable impact, and realizing your organization’s vision.

We offer a range of services to meet every client's needs, and we would be honored to work with you. If you need a custom quote, let us know your needs and we’ll get to work.

Results from previous projects at a glance:

Climate Empowerment Learning Initiative for high & middle school students

  • High school participation: 119 course sections; 319 total days of logged instruction; 22,952 student-hours of climate justice teaching & learning.

  • Middle School: 236 course sections; 451 logged instruction days; 32,000 student-hours.

Promise Neighborhoods (community-wide coordination for “whole child” educational supports)

  • 32 interviews analyzed (~1,500 minutes) spanning 7 institutional partners (1 school district, 1 university, 1 community college, 1 city library, 3 nonprofit organizations).

  • 1) Co-Design & Curriculum Rollout Sprint

    • Co-design workshop facilitation and training

    • Units/lessons that are “ready-to-go”

    • Implementation calendar (“lesson blasts”/rollout cycles)

    • Staff collaboration plan for expansion beyond core initiating team

    • Success: Cross-disciplinary adoption

    2) Program Design Push (4–6 weeks)

    • Best for: teams starting a new initiative or needing coherence across courses/grades

    • Deliverables: scope & sequence map, units/lessons, implementation timeline, facilitation plan

    • Success: “ready-to-go” package your team can implement in the next term

    3) Curriculum & Community Integration Plan (6–10 weeks)

    • Best for: initiatives that seek community-centered, locally relevant learning

    • Deliverables: community partner map, roles/responsibilities, logistics plan

    • Success: projects that are feasible, equitable, and scalable (not one-off)

  • 1) Professional Learning & Implementation Support (Semester/Year)

    • PD arc (6–10 sessions) & facilitation guides

    • Coaching/observation cycles (enabled by release time)

    • Department implementation routines & shared planning artifacts

    • Best for: teacher teams who need sustained PD (not a single workshop)

    • Deliverables: session sequence, facilitation guides, participant materials, reflection tools

    • Success: teacher buy-in & consistent implementation across classrooms

    • Increased student agency/belonging through youth climate-action solutions

    • More explicit workforce development/career exploration embedded in instruction

  • 1) Evaluation Quickstart (4–8 weeks)

    • Best for: grant-funded projects that need credible evidence in a timely manner

    • Deliverables: theory of change, measures, data collection plan, analysis memo, reporting template

    • Success: impact story & plan you can sustain internally

    2) Impact Report & Dashboard Package (8–12 weeks)

    • Best for: district/nonprofit leaders reporting to funders, boards, or partners

    • Deliverables: evaluation report, executive summary, visual dashboard, recommendations brief

    • Success: decision-ready insights (what to scale, adapt, discontinue)

    • Measures aligned to outcomes (knowledge, “heart orientation,” skills, careers)

    • Teacher implementation log system & reporting template

    • Student survey instrument plan (pre/post)

    • First “baseline” memo & recommendations

    3) Annual Impact Report & Partner-Ready Narrative (8–12 weeks)

    • Executive summary & full report

    • Visual “results at a glance” section

    • Recommendations section

  • 1) Backbone Coordination & Systems Improvement

    • Best for: multi-partner networks (district, colleges, city, nonprofits) working toward functioning as one coherent ecosystem.

    • Typical timeline: quarterly or annual partnership support

    • What you get:

      • Shared aims & operating routines (meeting cadence, decision pathways)

      • Cross-partner alignment tools (role clarity, communication hubs)

      • Support using shared language/metrics for continuous improvement

How we work:

Discover → Design → Deliver → Measure → Feedback

Discover (1–2 weeks): alignment call(s), document review, goals & constraints

Design: co-design with your team, draft deliverables, feedback loops

Deliver: facilitation/support & implementation tools

Measure: flexible multi-source evidence plan, reporting, recommendations

Feedback & Strategize: sensemaking & reflective/reflexive engagement

  • The Climate Empowerment Learning Initiative (CELI) is built on a teacher-led, cross-disciplinary climate education community across a feeder middle–to-high school pathway in Hayward, Calfornia. Over the four-year duration of CELI (2021–2025), our research team examined patterns of collaboration of over 72 participants involving teachers, students, administrators (2 principals and 3 assistant principals), local nonprofit directors, and university researchers. From the middle school, we engaged 31 participants, consisting of 23 classroom teachers. At the high school, we noted 20 participants, including 16 classroom teachers. CELI’s leadership model centered teachers as Head-Heart-Hands Leads (34) and STEM Core Leads (5), who were supported by network coordination roles and an advisory board. The importance of our work can be seen with the 44 participants who dedicated their time for two or more years, including a stable core of 17 who participated across all four years. Teachers' subject areas spanned ELA/ELD, science/STEM, social studies, math, world languages, arts, special education, and PE/health, reflecting CELI’s interdisciplinary approach and focus on scaling beyond a single department.

    Overview

    • Initiative scope

      • A multi-year, teacher-led climate & sustainability education initiative implemented across a secondary school pathway.

      • Participation included educators, school leaders, & external support partners.

    • Participation & roles

      • The initiative tracked 70+ unique participants over four years.

      • Participation included:

        • Classroom teachers (the largest group)

        • Teacher-leadership roles (multiple tiers)

        • Coordination roles supporting implementation

        • Advisory/steering roles

        • School administrators (principals & assistant principals)

        • University, district, & community partner personnel

    • Continuity over time (sustained participation):

      • Participation by year:

        • 41 in 2021–22, 36 in 2022–23, 39 in 2023–24, 35 in 2024–25

      • CELI sustained a stable core (site admin & teachers):

        • 44 participants engaged for 2+ years

        • 24 participants engaged for 3+ years

        • 17 participants engaged across all four years

    • Cross-disciplinary reach (not just science):

      • Participating educators spanned ELA/ELD, science/STEM, social studies, math, world languages, arts, special education, PE/health, plus leadership/assistant roles (supporting CELI’s interdisciplinary model).

    • How impact was measured: implementation logs, surveys, interviews/focus groups, observations, artifacts.

    • What leaders noticed: initiating & cultivating bottom-up approaches toward interdisciplinary practices in climate education resulted in a climate resolution passed by the district to expand the CELI model across their schools.

  • HPN is a community-driven project that scaled and coordinated educational and family-support services through a cross-institutional partnership operating within an urban public-school district. The network maintained a large active pool of participants (nearly 200 people) from 10 partnership institutions (local community college, universities, family support services, youth engagement), collaborating with 14 K–12 schools (8 elementary and 6 secondary). Supports were organized into four pathways (early learning, K–12, college and career readiness, and family/community outreach), allowing partners to align their efforts across the "whole student" experience. Scaling was not without its challenges but with strengthened coordination, the network built a reflexive learning system grounded in structured data collection, including semi-structured interviews with both backbone leaders and program implementers to support improvement decisions informed by on-the-ground experience.

    • Network scope

      • A cross-partners network supporting students & families within a public-school district.

      • Active contact list of nearly 200 people across district & partner organizations.

    • Participation & convening

      • Major convenings bring together ~60 unique participants, with representation split between district staff & external partners (including site staff).

      • Attendance tracking shows consistent engagement across key partners.

    • Geographic & site reach

      • Work spans 14 school sites across elementary, middle, & high school levels.

    • Service model

      • Coordinated supports are organized into four pathways:

        • Early learning

        • K–12 supports

        • College & career readiness

        • Family & community supports

      • The system observes dozens of program line-items across these pathways to support coordination & continuity.

    • Learning & improvement system

      • Continuous improvement is supported by structured data gathering (e.g., interviews with backbone leaders & program implementers).

      • Interview tracking includes completion & transcription to support analysis & decision-making.

    • What we did: network learning & evidence evaluation across community partners, interviews transcribed/analyzed in MaxQDA.

    • Scale: 32 interviews / ~1,500 minutes across multiple organizations.

    • Network function: partners describe HPN as the backbone coordinating an integrated “whole child” ecosystem.

For additional case study information, please see here.

Contact Us

Interested in working together? Fill out some info and we will be in touch shortly. We can’t wait to hear from you!